订阅
|
The architectural cultural heritage is defined as the traditional style buildings in the long-term development, which has a outstanding and universal value. As many people were not aware of the importance of protecting the architectural cultural heritage, a lot of cultural relics are being destroyed in China. Firstly, it relates to severely degraded cultural heritage, and serious loss of historical sites also the loss of cultural significance. The target of this essay is sustainable cities and communities, which is necessary for protecting all world natural and cultural heritage. The 17 Goals Sustainable Development Available online (2023) states that UNESCO 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development proposes that cities andhuman settlements should be made to be inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable, andemphasizes that further efforts should be made to protect the world’s cultural and naturalheritage. And Cultural Data Management and Communication can help to solve the problem of threatened by nature or human influence. The aim of this essay is to improve the the public’s awareness to protect the architectural cultural heritage in China. This essay will secondly focus on comparing and contrasting research. Then solutions will be evaluated and one will be chose to safeguard the architectural cultural heritage in China. Secondly, three research will be described in this essay. Different research have discussed three buildings of Zangniang Stupa and Sangzhou Lamasery in Qinghai、a historical garden site in Huan’an, Jiangsu Province, China and Qinglian Temple in Shanxi, China as case studies. Xu, C., Zhao, Y. and Wu, C. (2022) analyzed methods to record historical relics especially in Tibetan area in China. This implies that HBIM system is conductive to eliminate in keeping incomplete records in the architectural cultural heritage. The HBIM is a new method that can cover and record sustainably current historical buildings. Similarly, Feng, D., Chiou, S. and Wang, F. (2021) agree with Zhang, X. et al. (2022) that the most importance problem to tackle is to inheritance culture build eternity. Most previous studies in the field of heritage protection and cultural heritage have lag the advances in digital techniques. In particular, the above situations in the past illustrated problems in the storing information and communicating data. However, those research filled the gap with the digital techniques via new media technologies. Digital technologies can be defined that utilizes digital signals for information storage, use, and transmission. It has showed that such digital techniques can applied to different types of cultural heritage, which is a significant part to focus on in the future. Then three research will be compared in this essay, there is no difference of the aim in three research. It can be seen that not only the local department but also everyone make efforts to protecting the building of cultural heritage and provide a suitable and safe environment for human society. In comparing Xu, C., Zhao, Y. and Wu, C. (2022) and Zhang, X. et al.’s(2022) book, it is evident that there are many practical difficulties to overcome in the protection of architectural heritage. For instance, it was found that many buildings were in the mixed area and were built in different times and materials. In the same way, Feng, D., Chiou, S. and Wang, F. (2021) indicated that historical sites with stories、facts and explanations is easy for people to form a better understanding of the architectural heritage. Thus, building a database has been ensured to classified different kinds of buildings, which is convenient to share data and research effectively. Next, more research will be contrasted further. In the recent studies, Wang, X. et al. (2023) subscribes to Xiao, B. et al. (2022) that methods and solutions are investigated from an economic perspective. It reveals that air pollution has a negative influence on the protecting of architectural cultural heritage in China. And both of them uses an econometric approach to assess the overall impact of air pollution on the sustainable protection of world cultural heritage in China. On the other hand, it can be demonstrated that local government provide forward policy to alleviate the negative impacts of air pollution on cultural heritage protection. In addition, Feng, D., Chiou, S. and Wang, F. (2021) claimed that there were the local government and local public’s responsibilities to alleviate the negative influence from the the damage of cultural heritage such us destroy human civilization、destroy urban development. And Xu, C., Zhao, Y. and Wu, C. (2022) draw attention to use the recording method(HBIM), which is mapped and scanned online software. The main weakness in the study is that they overlooked conditions and space limitations. On the other hand, Feng, D., Chiou, S. and Wang, F. (2021) analysed the landscape narrative data which are utilized by the local residents. In addition, Zhang, X. et al. ’s book (2022) is limited that it ignores some significant factors are not considered such as the effects of climate change、temperature to the building of cultural heritage. According to the Wang, X. etal. (2023)，they states that over the past decades, conventional air pollutants have been improved because of clean air actions in China, which produces a valuable benefit for architectural cultural heritage conservation. The results indicate that almost all the air pollutants except for CO have significantly negative effects on heritage. But studies and data from previous have suggested that the local government can utilize technologies and database to cultural heritage documentation. So the previous studies and data failed to focus on the complexity of the damage factors, also the function does not take into consideration the natural climatic factors, such as temperature, wind, and moisture. In conclusion, these studies have investigated what factors that effects the buildings of cultural heritage and came up with the best solution to protect architectural heritage precisely and flexibly. These solutions will be evaluated and one best will be chosen to meet target. So the current method put forward by Xu, C., Zhao, Y., and Wu, C. (2022). cannot fully meet all needs of architectural cultural heritage in the world. However, both architecture cultural heritage and economic growth should put emphasis on keeping balance. In contrast, in the present research, the community and the local government play vital roles in protecting cultural heritage. For example, it appears that present methods have some positive effects, but in the long-run, it would also result in significant revenue losses. Consequently, Feng, D., Chiou, S. and Wang, F. (2021) argues that the local residents can participate in the buildings of heritage protection. Also, it is valuable for local people to understand the significance of architecture cultural heritage sustainability. So it has been proved that adopting to the landscape narrative as the main research content and taking “data speak” method from the Qing Yan Yuan in Huan’an, China. The “data speak” is the part of which combines interview the local residents with collect and analyse data in those interviews. Therefore, methods like digitization and digital preservation used in the “oral speak” is an opportunity to preserve it and share it with the public. Thus an inductive qualitative method is the best way to record historical sites sustainably and meet stability and compatibility because this method can promote public’s awareness of heritage protection. Those present research explore an path to strengthen the sustainability of architecture cultural heritage and enhance the local community’ well-being in China. The role of research have been considered on both sides. To protect and utilize architectural heritage, considering both economic factors and geographical environment is necessary. It has been suggested that the “data speak” is the better way to stimulate the public’s awareness of cultural heritage. However, the method still needs to improve because there is only a small part of architectural heritage is protected in China. In the future, there will be some forward method should be explored and provided of heritage conservation for different regions, including economic capacity of different countries、cultural backgrounds between citizens and the historical sites. Furthermore, the research would been more relevant if a wider range of database of architectural heritage had been explored. 
|
|
10 人收藏 |
 鲜花 |
 握手 |
 雷人 |
 路过 |
 鸡蛋 |
收藏
邀请
654人
